001Law practices

AI Employees for law practices

Legal intake is decided on the phone, usually within the first hour, and usually by whoever answered. A prospective client with an urgent matter calls three firms. The one that picks up gets the matter. Ava is the one that picks up.

002The sequence

What happens to the call you were in a hearing for.

Intake is decided by whoever answered. This is the order the enquiry moves through, and where each of the four takes it.

  1. 01Ava

    Takes the intake call

    Matter type, timeline and contact details are captured, enough is asked to sort a matter worth a fee earner’s hour from one that is not, and the consultation is booked into the right diary.

    Matter captured
  2. 02Kai

    Answers what does not need a lawyer

    Procedural questions about how the firm works, what happens next and what to bring, answered consistently rather than by a chain of emails.

    No hour spent
  3. 03Tessa

    Holds the weeks before the engagement letter

    Legal decisions stall. Contact is maintained through them across SMS and email, without anybody having to diarise it.

    Still in touch
  4. 04Russell

    Stays reachable once instructed

    Client queries answered in the window where the answer still matters, closing the response-time gap after the matter is opened.

    Gap closed
003How the roster helps

Three places the work is already leaking.

01

Answer intake before the next firm does

Ava takes the call at 7pm, on a Saturday, and during the hearing you are sitting in. She captures the matter type, the timeline and the contact details, and books the consultation into the right fee earner’s diary.

After hoursMatter captureConsult booking
02

Qualify before it reaches a fee earner

Not every call is a matter you want. The intake conversation captures enough to sort the enquiries worth an hour of a lawyer’s time from the ones that are not — before that hour is spent.

QualificationMatter triageTime protection
03

Keep prospective clients warm through a long decision

Legal decisions stall. Tessa maintains contact through the weeks between the first call and the engagement letter, without anybody having to diarise it.

Follow-upLong cycleMulti-channel
004What has to be right

The details that decide whether it works here.

Generic voice AI fails in specific ways in every industry. These are the three that matter in law practices, and how they are handled during setup.

01

It does not give legal advice

The AI captures information and books time. It does not opine on a matter, and the boundary is defined by you during setup rather than discovered later.

02

Conflicts and escalation stay human

Anything that touches a conflict check, a limitation date, or a distressed caller routes straight to a named person with the transcript attached.

03

Escalation to a person, on your rules

You define what the AI must never handle alone. Anything past that line is routed to a named person with the full transcript attached, rather than being guessed at. Human oversight is a design requirement, not a fallback.

005Next step

Twenty minutes to find out if this applies to you.

Setup is $3,000 per AI Employee, or $10,000 for four under the Go All In plan. Published on the pricing page, not held behind a form.

Talk to a person

Bring your call log to the call and we will work through your actual numbers rather than an industry average.

Book my demo

Or call +1 813-252-1961 directly. See all industries.